Advertisement
Advertisement
Japan
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
A WWII-era Soviet IS-2 tank stands in the village of Malokurilskoye on the island of Shikotan – one of the Kuril Islands annexed by Soviet forces in the closing days of the conflict. Photo: Reuters

Are US troops in Japan to blame for Tokyo, Moscow never signing a treaty to formally end WWII?

  • A Kremlin spokesman blamed the presence of US troops in Japan for the lack of a peace treaty between Tokyo and Moscow to formally end World War II
  • Moscow’s ‘carrot-and-stick’ tactic over the treaty goes back decades, analysts say, and Tokyo is more focused on its summit with Manila and Washington
Japan
Russia has dredged up a Cold War-era strategy in an effort to drive a wedge between Tokyo and Washington, analysts say, after a Kremlin spokesman blamed the presence of US troops in Japan for the lack of a peace treaty between Moscow and Tokyo to formally conclude World War II.
Dmitry Peskov’s remarks – that the American presence in Japan had been an obstacle to a peace treaty for the last 79 years – could even be interpreted as hinting at Moscow’s willingness to return a group of islands seized by Soviet forces in the closing days of the war, on condition that US troops leave Japan.
They came amid the backdrop of this week’s trilateral talks among Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, US President Joe Biden and Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov’s comments came amid the backdrop of this week’s trilateral talks between Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, US President Joe Biden and Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr. Photo: dpa
“The de facto defence alliance is already there, and we know about the United States’ military potential that is stationed in Japan – close to our borders,” Peskov said. “This has always been a stumbling block in trying to reach a settlement of our main problem, the peace treaty.”
Tokyo and Moscow have held discussions for years over the islands of Etorofu – Iturup in Russian – Kunashiri (or Kunashir), Shikotan and the Habomai Islets that were occupied just days before Japan’s surrender in 1945. Former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe came closest to an agreement in 2016 with Russian President Vladimir Putin on the territory’s joint economic development.

But no consensus was reached, and Putin has taken an increasingly firm line on the issue, passing legislation making it illegal to cede any Russian territory to another country. As a result of the impasse, the two countries have never signed a peace treaty to formally end the second world war.

Japan aims to fight ‘negative narratives’ with Russian exchanges: analyst

Russia’s “carrot-and-stick” diplomatic approach to Japan dates back to Andrei Gromyko becoming foreign minister of the Soviet Union in the late 1950s, said Russian-born Yakov Zinberg, a professor of international relations at Tokyo’s Kokushikan University.

“In the past, Moscow proposed that Japan become neutral and that they would then be willing to return the islands, that a peace treaty could be signed and that there would be no reason for Japan to fear the Soviet Union,” he told This Week in Asia. “Obviously, the aim was to create a split with the US, and that policy effectively continues to this day.”

Russia has said the US-Japan security treaty gives the Americans the right to construct military facilities anywhere in Japan, and that Washington would take advantage of that agreement to build bases on the islands if they were returned.

A bust of Soviet state founder Vladimir Lenin is seen in front of a Russian Orthodox church on the Island of Kunashir, one of four islands known as the Southern Kurils in Russia and the Northern Territories in Japan. Photo: Reuters
Peskov’s comments also came as Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov arrived in Beijing on Monday for an official visit, Zinberg said.
“Russia does not want to be overly dependent on China and I think these comments out of Moscow can also be understood to mean that Russia is still willing to work with Japan,” he said.

“Moscow knows Japan needs Russian oil and gas and the new ambassador said recently that Russia would be willing to help Japanese companies that have stayed in the country, so I see this as an effort to seduce Japan and distance it from the US.”

But there is virtually no likelihood of distancing Japan from the US, Zinberg said.

Tokyo hopes to one day see the islands returned, but that cannot happen at the cost of weaker national security as a result of US forces withdrawing from Japan, said James Brown, an international-relations professor who specialises in Russian affairs at the Tokyo campus of Temple University.

“Japan is going to shrug this off as their entire focus at the moment is on the trilateral talks with the US and the Philippines,” he said, referring to the two-day talks that begin in Washington on Thursday.

02:12

Russia launches missile drills to test its ability to deliver ‘massive’ retaliatory nuclear strike

Russia launches missile drills to test its ability to deliver ‘massive’ retaliatory nuclear strike

He added that it was a “bit rich” for Moscow to identify the US as the stumbling block to a peace treaty, given Russia’s constant offers of an agreement over the years only to stall for time and ultimately fail to reach consensus.

In the meantime, Russia’s military continues to test Japan’s defences, Brown said. A Tu-95 long-range reconnaissance aircraft was tracked off Hokkaido earlier this month while a Russian intelligence-gathering ship has been hugging Japan’s northern coast in recent weeks, coming close to the Noto Peninsula before travelling south, passing through the Tsushima Strait and operating near the Okinawa island of Miyakojima.

“My feeling is that yes, Japan would like to have the Northern Territories back again, but the former residents are old now and there is not the same clamour for their return as there was in the past,” Zinberg said.

“The issue is not as strong as it once was, and it does not give the same leverage as it did. This will not have any effect on Japan’s relations with the US at all.”

10