Gustav Klimt painting auctioned for US$32 million was the subject of a claim of ownership just before its sale
- Gustav Klimt’s Portrait of Fraulein Lieser had not been seen in public for a century when it was put up for auction, where a Hongkonger bid US$32 million for it
- Just before its sale a man, reportedly a potential heir to the original owner’s legal successor, came forward claiming to own the unfinished painting
A last-minute claim of ownership of a painting by the Austrian artist Gustav Klimt was made just before it was sold to an anonymous Hong Kong collector in an auction in Vienna on April 24, it has emerged.
The unfinished work from 1917, begun just before the painter died, has prompted much speculation over its provenance since it was rediscovered 100 years after it was painted.
When Klimt died of a stroke in early 1918, the painting was given to the family who had commissioned it, according to the im Kinsky auction house.
Nazi’s son wins praise for returning looted art to Poland
But what happened to the painting between 1925 and the 1960s, a period that includes the Nazi dictatorship in Austria, remains a mystery. It resurfaced only when the auction house announced the sale.
It was auctioned on behalf of the current Austrian owners, who have not been identified. It was sold on behalf of these owners and the legal successors of Adolf Lieser and his sister-in-law Henriette, based on the Washington Principles – an international but non-binding treaty that helps resolve issues relating to Nazi-confiscated art.
A report by journalist Olga Kronsteiner, who writes for Austrian newspaper Der Standard, says a new claim to the painting was lodged the day before the sale.
This person found out about the sale at the last minute from reading a media report and came forward to lodge their claim.
Der Standard’s article says that the claimant, a Munich-based architect, is not a familial heir but rather a potential heir to the legal successor of Adolf Lieser.
Kronsteiner said in an email to the Post that the potential heir’s lawyer made claims to the wrong party – the auction house – when he should have contacted the other legal successors of Adolf Lieser, or their lawyers, to confirm whether his claim would be considered valid.
We have been assured that the seller and all Lieser heirs are covered [by the contract between the auction house and the consignor]
Valerie Gaber, head of marketing at im Kinsky auction house, told the Post in an email that the painting remained in Austria at the time of writing, and added that the contract between the consignor and the auction house did not allow for new claims to invalidate the sale.
“And to be complete: this claim has absolutely nothing to do with the competences [sic] of the Austrian denkmalamt,” she wrote, referring to the Bundesdenkmalamt, the country’s monuments protection office.
Patti Wong, owner of Hong Kong-based art advisory firm Patti Wong & Associates, who bid for her unnamed Hong Kong client, said: “We have been assured that the seller and all Lieser heirs are covered [by the contract between the auction house and the consignor].
“We further understand that the new claimant had been referred to Wedlake Bell, the Lieser heirs’ solicitors, to address and resolve [the matter].”
