In calling it a great power contest, the US is whitewashing its aggression towards China
- The US-China conflict is a struggle between an aggressor and a resisting party. Casting it as a geopolitical contest suggests both parties share equal responsibility
- Worse, to justify its unprovoked aggression, Washington has gone to great lengths to paint China as the attacking party and itself as the victim
Tensions between China and the United States are widely described in the West as a great power competition or geopolitical contest between the world’s largest economies. But this suggests they share equal responsibility for their fraught ties when they play distinctively different roles.
Over the years, these set-ups addressed many concerns and contributed significantly to the development of ties – until many were effectively ditched by the Trump administration.
One wonders if Austin would still be keen to sit down to a meeting with Li if China had sanctioned him for his role in arming Taiwan, a move many Chinese believe would put Austin in the same awkward position as Li. Could we expect Washington to view Beijing’s sanctions on Austin the same way it deems its measures on Li?
Rather than prioritise the surging demand for flights from students, tourists and businesspeople, the US Department of Transport said its “overriding goal is an improved environment wherein the carriers of both parties are able to exercise fully their bilateral rights to maintain a competitive balance and fair and equal opportunity”.
But the higher costs incurred by US airlines has nothing to do with China. Rather, it is an issue to be sorted out between the US and Russia. How can a reasonable man forbid someone else from selling property at a better price than his own when he has damaged his own house because of a brawl?
These are not isolated cases. Washington’s role as the attacker and China as the defender is on full display in their frictions in all other fields.
What if China declared a protectionist trade war on the US and the West?
The conflict between China and the US is, therefore, a struggle between an aggressor and a resisting party. Casting the tensions between the two countries as a geopolitical contest distorts the very nature of the conflict, and is akin to equating the victim with the aggressor.
And yet, to justify its unprovoked aggression against China, Washington has gone to great lengths to paint China as the attacking party and itself as the victim.
To address one of the critical issues of our times, the rest of the world should be clear-eyed, seek to identify the attacking party and hold it responsible. As a Chinese saying goes, he who tied the knot is best positioned to untie it.
Zhou Xiaoming is a senior fellow at the Centre for China and Globalisation in Beijing and a former deputy representative of China’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations Office in Geneva