How China’s rise is helping to unite America behind Donald Trump’s trade war
- Beijing’s decision to substantially revise a draft trade agreement and the veiled threat on supplies of rare earth metals have provoked Americans who believe Washington is making a fair request for market access and an end to tech theft
“Yo, good game, man. You were the best player on our team.” This is a common post-game taunt in American sports when one is shaking hands with an opponent. American football players sometimes don’t get it, which adds to its zing.
The next time US President Donald Trump meets his trade war opponent and Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping, he could try the line. In their “whose tariffs are bigger” contest, Xi’s actions over the past few weeks have helped Trump a lot.
These aren’t overarching, unifying issues to Americans like democracy and human rights are though, and Americans seem to be preparing to endure some economic pain to defend these principles, which they believe are the foundations of the US.
Some of Trump’s fiercest opponents have come out in the past few weeks backing him on the trade war, usually with some version of “I don’t like the guy, but I’m with him on this one”.
Even Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, an ex-Wall Street investment banker who is the friendly guy on the US side of the table, spoke out against Chinese tactics.
In the elite circles of Lighthizer’s and Mnuchin’s private-sector careers, professionals usually terminate negotiations when the other side tries to “re-trade” on points already agreed.
Xi’s visit followed an editorial in the state-run Global Times, headlined: “US need for rare earths an ace in Beijing’s hand”, which clarified the implication: disrupt Huawei’s supply chain and we’ll disrupt much more of yours.
To Americans who believe that US negotiators are simply asking China for market access and an end to the theft of US tech, and that Huawei is a separate issue, the implied threat – to weaponise rare earths and hurt the US economy broadly – was inappropriate and provocative.
And news that US businesses in China believe they are being hurt by customs and other officials in retaliation for the trade war also helps Trump garner support at home. Americans find it hard to conclude that these things aren’t happening without tacit approval from Beijing.
This phenomenon of local hostility has always been one of the reasons why concluding any agreement with Beijing seems unlikely to change much on the ground for US companies.
Taken together, these recent events show a China not interested in acceding to what Americans believe are simple, fair requests for market access and protection of US intellectual property. The latter has become a sine qua non of any trade deal for US political and business leaders of all stripes. And they don’t want Trump to back down on the issue.
All societies evolve and China, under the Communist Party, will change. But Chinese businesspeople won’t make changes that hit them in the wallet unless Beijing actively forces them to.
And little about the Communist Party under Xi indicates that Beijing is in any mood to take orders from a US president who is regularly ridiculed in the state-controlled media.
Robert Boxwell is director of the consultancy Opera Advisors