Can Hong Kong officials rely on the pro-establishment camp to achieve political success?
As the adage goes, only interests are eternal, and getting motions and funding passed in the city’s polarised legislature requires a deft touch
“No eternal allies, no perpetual enemies ... [only] interests are eternal and perpetual.” Fortunately or unfortunately, this famous quote by Lord Palmerston, Britain’s foreign secretary back in 1848, still makes much sense today, in Hong Kong in particular.
Hong Kong can spend HK$40 billion a year on needy for next decade and still be in good financial shape, think tank says
And yet the pro-government camp was still not happy after Chan’s latest remedy was rolled out, which both the finance chief and his boss insisted was not a U-turn but a result of listening to the voices of the public.
The government’s traditional allies were unhappy partly because it had apparently decided the latest relief measures based on a good combination of suggestions from all parties, including the pan-democrats, instead of just the pro-establishment ones that were eager to take credit.
A hard political reality in Hong Kong is that the administration, which does not have a single vote in Legco, is supposed to keep its executive-led governance. But despite Beijing’s repeated calls for the pro-establishment parties to support the city’s leader and the government, under election politics, they simply cannot afford to be seen as taken-for-granted supporters.
Their requests for a cash handout for all was but one example.
On the other hand, the pan-democrats, by nature, are the opposition rather than government allies. Lam’s reconciliation efforts are working to a certain extent, but may backfire if the pro-establishment groups see them as a challenge or threat to their interests when the government moves closer to their rivals.
Political alliance means political interest calculation, and the pro-establishment camp is no exception – but even more so sometimes, it seems.