Advertisement
Advertisement
Indonesia
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
A photo of Indonesian President Joko Widodo (right) shaking hands with presidential elect Prabowo Subianto is displayed on a large screen during Subianto’s campaign rally at Gelora Bung Karno Main Stadium in Jakarta on February 10. Photo: AP

Indonesia’s ‘kingmaker’ Joko Widodo leaves indelible mark on nation with Prabowo Subianto win

  • Widodo’s pragmatic approach created a stable political climate and economic growth, but critics say democracy and human rights have regressed under his rule
  • Widodo likely to have ‘plan up his sleeve’ after backing his son Gibran and former general Prabowo Subianto’s winning ticket, analysts say
Indonesia
Indonesia’s elections concluded on Wednesday with two clear winners, president-elect Prabowo Subianto and a new kingmaker, outgoing President Joko Widodo.
Widodo, who will hand the presidency over to Prabowo on October 20, is barred by the constitution from a third term, but his influence will still be in play through his son, Gibran Rakabuming Raka, Indonesia’s vice-president-elect, making his clan the new guard in the world’s third-largest democracy, analysts said.
“Of all the political actors who exist [in Indonesia today], you could say that Jokowi is currently the new kingmaker. We don’t know what Jokowi will do in the future, but so far Jokowi has the strongest capacity to [influence] the government for the next five years,” said Ahmad Rizky Umar, lecturer at the School of Political Science and International Studies at Australia’s University of Queensland, using Widodo’s popular nickname.
President-elect Prabowo Subianto greets supporters in Medan at a rally on January 13. Photo: AP
According to quick count results from the Centre for Strategic and International Studies Indonesia, Prabowo and Gibran won 58.4 per cent of the vote, more than the 50 per cent threshold required to win and avoid a run-off vote.

“This is proof [Widodo] is indeed a very popular president, so he can influence the election,” said Made Supriatma, researcher at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore.

By backing the winning pair, Widodo has also shown that he can trump over the country’s top power brokers, particularly his former political matriarch, Megawati Sukarnoputri, chairwoman of the ruling Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) and a former president.

PDI-P’s presidential candidate, former Central Java governor Ganjar Pranowo, earned just 16.7 per cent of Wednesday’s vote, languishing behind opposition candidate Anies Baswedan, who received 24.8 per cent.

03:09

Prabowo Subianto declares victory in Indonesian election as early counts give him 58% of votes

Prabowo Subianto declares victory in Indonesian election as early counts give him 58% of votes
Made said Widodo’s son Gibran, the 36-year-old mayor of Solo, was a liability to Prabowo due to the controversies surrounding his candidacy. Those include the ruling made by the Constitutional Court – presided over at the time by Widodo’s brother-in-law – that created an exception to the 40-year-old minimum age requirement that allowed Gibran to run, as well as his unethical registration process at the General Election Commission.

But Made said Widodo’s enormous popularity – with an approval rating of nearly 80 per cent in December – was so strong that most voters were willing to overlook those issues.

Widodo also landed himself in hot water several times throughout the election season, saying he would “meddle” in the election to ensure continuity; revealing he knew the goings-on of political parties from state intel bodies; and saying a sitting president can campaign for a certain candidate if he wishes.

He has also been accused of using state instruments to promote Prabowo’s ticket, including through the politicisation of welfare benefits to the poor, such as staple goods that were labelled gifts from the president though they were bought with the state budget.

A banner with an image depicting Indonesian President Joko Widodo behind bars is laid out on the road during a rally demanding a fair presidential election outside the General Election Commission building in Jakarta on February 9. Photo: AP

Bane or boon?

During the campaign season, Prabowo portrayed himself as a loyalist to the president, a reversal from his position as a vocal Widodo critic during his failed bids for the presidency in 2014 and 2019.

However, analysts argued that Widodo has taken a risk in backing Prabowo and trusting that the former special forces commander will continue his signature programmes, such as the new 466 trillion rupiah (US$30 billion) capital city of Nusantara being built in the forests of Borneo and his downstreaming policy that has seen the export of raw critical minerals from Indonesia banned in favour of constructing domestic refining facilities.

Indonesia urged to probe causes of illegal nickel exports to China

“It is unlikely that Prabowo will do what Jokowi wants. Even if he does, at most he will only continue 20 or 40 per cent of Jokowi’s legacy [programmes],” said Nicky Fahrizal, a political researcher at CSIS Indonesia. “Jokowi is doing some high-level gambling.”

Ian Wilson, an Indonesian politics researcher and lecturer at Australia’s Murdoch University, predicts that Widodo might have a plan, pointing to speculation that Prabowo would only be president for two years due to declining health.

“As a president, Prabowo can do whatever he wants, and the idea that Jokowi will be safe is a naive assumption. But I also assume Jokowi has got some plan up his sleeve,” Wilson said.

“The presidency is a draining role. If Prabowo only [manages to be a president] for two years and he can’t handle it, then [Widodo’s] son will become the president and Widodo is in the box seat. A lot of that is possible.”

Defence Minister Prabowo Subianto adjusts his tie as Indonesian President Joko Widodo (left) and his deputy Ma’ruf Amin (right) take their position for a group photo with other new cabinet ministers after the swearing-in ceremony on October 23, 2019. Photo: AP
Ahmad from the University of Queensland said it is likely that Widodo will ask Prabowo to install several people from his inner circle to ensure continuity from his administration. Those figures might include Luhut Pandjaitan, a former general at odds with Prabowo when they were in the army, and State-Owned Enterprises Minister Erick Thohir, who has been a huge Prabowo backer this election.

Ahmad argues that Prabowo is likely to revisit some of Widodo’s foreign policies since the former general dreams of Indonesia playing a bigger role on the international stage.

“Jokowi’s relationship with Prabowo is actually up and down in several ways. There are several statements made by Prabowo, for example, which imply that he does not really agree with Jokowi’s foreign policies, as he wants Indonesia to have a stronger position in international politics,” Ahmad said.

Indonesia election: is Jokowi’s ‘partiality’ for Prabowo a double-edged sword?

Jokowi, ‘man of deception’?

This year’s heated election also saw the country divided over Widodo’s decade of leadership, with some praising him for bringing political and economic stability to the country while others accused him of repressing and subverting democracy.

In the pursuit of securing his political future, Widodo has wrecked his image as a “man of the people”, said critics, including Made, who has long tracked Widodo’s political career.

“To me, he is now a man of deception. What went wrong with him? I will never know,” Made said.

President Joko Widodo and First Lady Iriana speak to the media after casting their ballots at a polling station. Photo: Reuters
Long gone are the days when Widodo was seen as Asia’s Barack Obama. Widodo rose from a humble background growing up in a riverside shanty neighbourhood in Solo, to becoming that city’s mayor before winning the governorship of Jakarta, followed by the start of his first presidential term in 2014.

Once dubbed by Time magazine as “A New Hope” for Indonesia, Widodo was the first president of Southeast Asia’s largest economy who did not have ties to the military or Jakarta’s elite political families. He earned his income as an exporter of furniture, an entrepreneurial trait inherited by his sons – both of whom ran food-related businesses, including peddling fried bananas and running coffee shops – before they entered politics.

Widodo won his man-of-the-people image, and five elections, in large part thanks to his frequent blusukan – impromptu, informal visits – during which he mingled with voters in places snubbed by elites, such as traditional markets and rice fields. He captured the attention of young voters by attending the heavy metal concerts of bands such as Metallica, taking selfies with his supporters, and posting about his daily life with his grandchildren on Instagram.

The appeal of Joko Widodo – president, everyman

Upon becoming president, Widodo quickly learned that political compromises were key to taming his opponents. He managed to lure opposition parties into his own expansive coalition and staffed his administration with ex-generals who were close to the dictator Suharto, chief among them Luhut, a top minister tasked with boosting China’s investments in Indonesia.

“There is no opposition in Indonesia, not because they’ve been banned, but because they’re being co-opted into a vast menagerie of deals and negotiations by Jokowi,” Wilson said.

Jokowi’s coalition parties occupy 471 seats in the parliament, or 81.9 per cent of total 575 seats.

Dynastic dealings

Widodo’s family is now considered by many to be a nascent political dynasty.

His eldest son Gibran is VP-elect while his other son, Kaesang Pangarep, 29, is chairman of the Indonesia Solidarity Party, which did not pass the vote threshold to win parliamentary seats during Wednesday’s election but has made inroads among the country’s young voters with its progressive policy platform.

(From left) Vice-presidential candidate Gibran Rakabuming Raka, the son of Indonesian President Joko Widodo and current Surakarta City mayor, Didit Hediprasetyo, fashion designer and the only son of presidential-elect and Defence Minister Prabowo Subianto, Kaesang Pangarep, Widodo’s youngest son and chairman of the Indonesian Solidarity Party, attend a Lunar New Year in Jakarta. Photo: AFP

Bobby Nasution, Widodo’s son-in-law, is reportedly seeking to run in North Sumatra’s next gubernatorial election, a leap from his current position as mayor of Medan.

Made of ISEAS said Jokowi is also likely to demand “concessions” from Prabowo, specifically positioning one of his sons to lead Jakarta. The capital remains financially attractive: it has a regional budget of over 100 trillion rupiah, far more than the 27 trillion rupiah allocated to Central Java or the 35 trillion rupiah for West Java.

“I predict that Jokowi envisions Kaesang becoming governor of Jakarta. If he is not old enough, Gibran will step in and take charge of Jakarta [as a vice-president]. Ironically, Jokowi created the new capital city, but actually his eyes are on Jakarta because he knows this is where the power is,” Made said.

While Widodo’s pragmatic approach has created a stable political climate – and steady economic growth averaging 5 per cent annually – critics say democracy and human rights have regressed under his leadership, undoing the nation’s progress since it became a democracy in the late 1990s.

‘Trauma’ of stateless Indonesian-Chinese in Suharto era relived in new book

In his victory speech on Wednesday night, Prabowo gave a shout out to Suharto, whom he “knows very well as I often had lunch with him”. Hundreds in the audience cheered at the mention of the late dictator, as well as the sight of his daughter Titik, to whom Prabowo was married for 15 years.

“The public will still remember Jokowi’s achievements, especially in the infrastructure sector, how he was able to ensure connectivity between regions in Indonesia, and how he was successful in controlling the Covid-19 pandemic so that the economic contraction was not so deep. He succeeded in ensuring a stable economy,” Fahrizal said.

“For people who are politically literate, they would say that in the last five years our democracy has not been very good. But for society in general, it’s better not to starve first. Then they would consider [progress in] politics and law enforcement.”

1