Green groups urge Hong Kong authorities to be more aggressive in setting air quality targets as 2-month public consultation starts
- Government proposes to tighten five air quality objectives and introduce three new parameters based on World Health Organization benchmarks
- It has kicked off a two-month public consultation on its latest review of air quality objectives
Environmental campaigners have appealed to the Hong Kong government to be more aggressive with its pollution-reduction targets as it kicked off a two-month public consultation on its latest review of air quality objectives (AQOs).
The government proposed to tighten five present AQOs and introduce three new parameters based on World Health Organization (WHO) benchmarks following assessments of a working group tasked with evaluating air quality improvement measures and setting targets to be met in 2030.
The Environment and Ecology Bureau will review AQOs every five years and put forward emission reduction measures to attain targets set under the global health agency’s air quality guidelines.
“The working group adopted scientific approaches to assess the situation of air quality in 2030. Having regard to the assessment results, the working group endorsed the proposal to tighten five prevailing AQOs and introduce three WHO [air quality guidelines] new parameters,” a bureau spokesman said.
The government added that Hong Kong’s air quality seen continuous improvement, with a more than 40 per cent to 60 per cent reduction in major air pollutants.
Visibility had also seen major improvements over the past decade.
But roadside ozone concentration hit 34 micrograms per cubic metre last year, a decade high, up from 31 in 2021.
Hong Kong to pull plug on free EV charging at government facilities later in year
Five existing targets for sulphur dioxide, respirable suspended particulates (PM10) and fine suspended particulates (PM2.5) will be tightened under the government proposals. The 24-hour target for sulphur dioxide will be aligned with the WHO benchmark.
Three new targets were introduced for nitrogen dioxide, ozone and carbon monoxide with the latter set to meet WHO standards.
But environmental campaigners said the government was not aggressive enough in setting new targets to combat air pollution.
Air pollution cuts lifespans in South Asia by 5 years or more: study
Green Power director Cheng Luk-ki, one of 20 members of the working group, said the proposed targets for air pollutant reduction were unsatisfactory.
“Of course, I hope all the targets can meet the WHO benchmarks which can sufficiently safeguard public health. But now only two targets are aligned with the WHO’s. The government is not proactive enough to combat air pollution,” he said.
“At present there is no mechanism to propel the government to improve the targets or enhance relevant measures if it fails to achieve a desirable result. Then we have to wait for another five years for the next review, which will be too slow.”
Patrick Fung, CEO of the Clean Air Network, an NGO, said he was unhappy that the annual target for nitrogen dioxide and ozone for an eight-hour period had not been tightened and remained at 40 micrograms per cubic metre and 160 micrograms per cubic metre respectively. He called on the authorities to cut it by half for the former and a quarter for the latter.
Hong Kong’s greenhouse gas emissions drop, but concern groups say more work needed
“To achieve the target of reducing nitrogen dioxide, the government could roll out more measures to reduce marine emissions,” he said.
“For the reduction of ozone, a more aggressive target will push the authorities to come up with more joint initiatives to reduce its emission in the region.”
Ground-level ozone is formed when volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides react with ultraviolet light. The major source of the pollutant is vehicle emissions.
The Clean Air Network said the proposed targets were still above the safe levels laid down by the WHO.
“Unfortunately the current review is based on an assessment of the air quality in 2030 … In other words, the AQOs are accommodating policy measures, which is, in our opinion, putting the cart before the horse,” the organisation said.
