Advertisement
Advertisement
British Prime Minister Liz Truss (left) and Chancellor of the Exchequer Kwasi Kwarteng smile for the cameras during a visit to Berkeley Modular in Northfleet, England, on September 23. Photo: AFP
Opinion
The View
by Andrew Hammond
The View
by Andrew Hammond

UK budget debacle could turn the electoral tide against Liz Truss and the Tories

  • The budget crisis is the worst possible start to Truss’s premiership, fuelling concerns about the leadership’s political and economic judgment
  • The odds appear to be growing that the Conservatives could lose a large number of seats at the next election and cede control to Labour
Liz Truss was selected as UK prime minister less than a month ago by party activists who saw her as a safe pair of hands, yet her government already faces a potential full-scale loss of market confidence in its economic strategy.
On Friday, new UK Finance Minister Kwasi Kwarteng launched an extraordinary emergency budget that turned on the fiscal taps with both massive new spending and also tens of billions of tax cuts in the largest dose of unfunded stimulus since at least the 1970s. Dramatically, markets have given Kwarteng’s proposals a big thumbs down with the most negative reaction to any UK fiscal event in living memory.
The crisis deepened after the Bank of England’s decision to rule out an emergency rise in interest rates prompted fresh selling of the pound. Financial markets remain far from clear about how the central bank will respond, as reflected by the pound’s movements on Monday as optimism over an interest rate intervention was followed by disappointment at the failure to deliver this. As of Tuesday, the pound was trading only marginally above parity with the US dollar, its lowest-ever rate with the US currency.

The Bank of England will hope the initial market panic eventually subsides as investors unpick the implications of Kwarteng’s budget. Yet, there is also a significant risk that the central bank and the government will lose control of fast-moving events.

In a sign that international policymakers are growing increasingly alarmed by the recent turmoil, Raphael Bostic, the president of the Atlanta Federal Reserve, spoke out on Monday. He said the sell-off in the pound reflected rising uncertainty about the direction of the UK economy, adding to concerns last week from former Treasury secretary Larry Summers.

While Kwarteng must have anticipated a negative market reaction to his budget, he clearly did not appreciate the full depth of investor angst. This was a big oversight on his part; it has been clear for some time his announcement could trigger a serious financial meltdown.

Take the example of Deutsche Bank foreign exchange strategist Shreyas Gopal, who warned on September 7 – the day Truss was formally appointed prime minister – that the risks of a “sterling crisis” should not be underestimated. He said the “risk premium on UK gilts is already rising … a crisis may sound extreme, but it is not unprecedented: a combination of aggressive fiscal spending, severe energy shock and a slide in sterling ultimately resulted in the UK having recourse to an IMF loan in the mid-1970s”.
People walk past a currency exchange bureau in London on September 26. The pound has slumped to its lowest level against the US dollar since 1971 after Britain’s finance minister hinted more tax cuts would follow those he announced last week. Photo: AP
Gopal was far from alone in his warnings within the financial market community. Moreover, Truss was also clearly warned, on many occasions, by former finance minister Rishi Sunak that her economic plans were “comforting fairy tales”.

It is not 100 per cent clear why Kwarteng refused to listen to such warnings. Neither is it clear why he decided to sack the Treasury department’s permanent secretary Tom Scholar, who might have been one key person to give the new government constructively critical counsel over its fiscal options.

Having dug himself into a deep political hole, Kwarteng now has the massive challenge of getting out of it. On Monday, he failed to reassure jittery markets with a promise that he would outline the government’s debt-reduction strategy in a statement at the end of November.

Britain leading the way as world enters an era of ‘omnishambles’

Many financial market participants appear to believe that talking tough will not be enough, however, and that official borrowing costs will need to rise more sharply and faster than previously anticipated to reverse the sterling’s slide. The irony is that this could well wipe out any boost from his growth push.

Politically, the budget debacle is the worst possible start to Truss’s time as prime minister, and there is already significant angst among Conservative members of parliament about the political and economic judgment of the new administration. In this context, Kwarteng’s political future could still be in jeopardy in coming months. While Truss will not throw him overboard without a real fight, this is still a significant possibility unless the finance minister’s package delivers clear growth dividends.

03:02

Liz Truss named Britain’s new Prime Minister and Conservative leader

Liz Truss named Britain’s new Prime Minister and Conservative leader

The chief beneficiary of Truss’s travails is likely to be the Labour Party, which is holding its annual conference in Liverpool. A new poll released Monday from YouGov put the opposition party some 17 points ahead of the Conservatives, its highest lead since then-prime minister Tony Blair’s second landslide election victory in 2001.

While Labour is taking nothing for granted given the volatile political mood, there is a growing sense in the party that the tide could be turning against the prospects of the Conservatives winning a historic fifth straight term of office. Some comparisons have been made between this month’s events and the “Black Wednesday” crisis in September 1992, when the Conservative government of then-prime minister John Major was forced to raise interest rates after the failure of his economic strategy.

No political era is identical to another, and 1992 has key differences as well as similarities with 2022. However, the odds appear to be growing that the Conservatives could lose a significant number of seats at the next election and that Labour could once again emerge as the largest party for the first time since the governments of Blair and Gordon Brown.

Andrew Hammond is an associate at LSE IDEAS at the London School of Economics

1