Philippine election offers opportunity to rethink the liberal narrative
- International critiques of Rodrigo Duterte’s authoritarianism and war on drugs are in stark contrast to the trust he enjoys at home
- The People Power movement, of which the Liberal Party has portrayed itself as the institutional embodiment, has failed most Filipinos. Antagonistic relations with China will not help
Almost everything you have heard about the Philippines in the past six years is fake news. Here is the standard narrative:
Here is the real story: During their three decades in control, the liberals failed the People Power movement. Before the Duterte era, drugs were killing the poorest neighbourhoods, corrupting politics and giving rise to “narco-generals”.
Despite the devastation wrought by the Covid-19 pandemic, the Philippine economy has expanded in the Duterte era while foreign investment has increased. Duterte enjoys widespread public trust in the country, and the campaign of Marcos and Davao City mayor Sara Duterte-Carpio – the daughter of the incumbent president – will build on his legacy.
Other candidates for president have only attracted marginal support. With the share of undecided voters shrinking, Marcos appears to be the clear favourite, barring any last-minute dramatic developments. His running mate Duterte enjoys a similar advantage in the race for vice-president, polling at around 58 per cent and holding a lead of more than 30 points on her nearest rival.
The Marcos-Duterte campaign enjoys broad regional support. Marcos has a significant presence in the north of the country as the former governor of Ilocos Norte province. Duterte, mayor of the largest city in Mindanao, is widely known in the south.
On foreign policy, Marcos and Duterte say they would retain military ties with the United States. However, they also plan to continue to recalibrate the economic relationship with China, which is the country’s largest trading partner and second-largest source of foreign tourists.
Since the rise of the People Power movement in 1986, the party has portrayed itself as its institutional embodiment. The narrative is flawed, but it has been bought by too many international observers and media. In reality, the movement has failed most Filipinos.
What’s behind the Philippines’ love for political princelings?
In the early 1960s, the Philippines’ per capita income on a purchasing power parity basis was higher than that of Malaysia and over twice as high as that of Thailand. By 2016, Philippine per capita income had fallen behind that of Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia.
Del Rosario’s think tank, the Stratbase ADR Institute, has been busy promoting these goals. Since last year, it has attempted to make China a central issue in this year’s presidential election.
The big question is whether the future of the Philippines will be driven by military pacts or peaceful development which fosters the living standards of ordinary Filipinos. Rising prosperity is only viable through peace and stability.
Dr Dan Steinbock is an internationally recognised strategist of the multipolar world and the founder of Difference Group