Hong Kong’s decision to shut out Mong Kok street performers shows government-business relations are a mess
Stephen Vines says the closing of the Sai Yeung Choi Street South pedestrian zone shows that Hong Kong’s ‘pro-business’ politicians clearly favour some types of business over others
Members of the Yau Tsim Mong District Council almost certainly did not intend to provide us with an opportunity to contemplate this nexus, but should be thanked all the same.
This hardly sounds as though it raises earth-shaking issues but, as ever, the big stuff is often hidden in the little stuff.
But now Sai Yeung Choi Street, home to a great deal of retail business and given a boost by the introduction of a pedestrian zone in 2000, are asking, “What happens now?” Unfortunately for the retail trade, it seems likely that the “solution” to the pedestrian zone will negatively affect the trade.
Watch: Mong Kok musicians silenced
Which brings us to potential customers: members of the public. Some of them obviously liked the street entertainers or they would not have handed them their cash, others may simply have liked the atmosphere they helped create, while others hated it.
There is quite an impressive conflict of interests here and solutions are not simple. However, we should bear in mind the following:
• A government that claims to be creating a level playing field for business has problems when it declares that one form of business is more needed than another.
• Is the role of government to cater for the interests of most people or to protect the interests of minorities?
• Where there are conflicts of interest, how are these to be mediated without causing unintentional damage?
The district councillors no doubt thought they did a good thing by addressing an issue that raised a lot of concern. However, it must be noted that those promoting this solution came from a party calling itself the Business and Professionals Alliance, yet it advocated a course of action likely to be inimical to business interests.
The councillors may have succeeded in curbing noise pollution and obstructions to the public thoroughfare but, as often happens when the lethal cocktail of politics and bureaucracy is dispensed, there is considerable collateral damage. Yet the reality is that, although you will keep hearing plaintive cries of “why not let businesses get on with business without government interference”, this is neither possible nor desirable in today’s complex societies.
Stephen Vines runs companies in the food sector and moonlights as a journalist and a broadcaster