Public consultation on land supply is doomed to fail, just like the ones before it
Stephen Vines says that public consultations serve to delay action that needs to be taken, and in the case of land and housing issues, that action should be to take on powerful vested interests, including the golf club in Fanling
This brings us to the second problem, which is Wong’s insistence that the powerful tycoons, who have never been known to meekly occupy the back seats in the room, will get no preference in the consideration of their views.
Maybe these powerful individuals will not sway Wong and his colleagues but their mandate is to recommend; government officials will make the decisions and they have been known to bow to the interests of the big tycoons who have considerable property interests.
And so we come to the nub of the matter, which is that the government has, yet again, used the device of a public consultation exercise to delay taking action and to defuse responsibility for prolonging delay, on the grounds that “public opinion is divided”.
In case anyone suspects an element of hyperbole here, consider the outcome of more or less every other public consultation exercise that has either concluded that opinion is too divided or that the public is ready to endorse whatever the government wanted to do in the first place.
Perhaps the accusation of nothing being done is too sweeping because what happens in practice is that, slowly but surely, decisions will be made favouring the tycoons who, for example, are sitting on farmland bought cheaply but with the potential to provide a cash bonanza if permission is granted for property development.
To solve Hong Kong’s housing crisis, there are only two viable options
This is the reality of how Hong Kong works, and it is tempered by some hard-headed realism. A classic example of this is what happened when the public housing programme was introduced. It may be imagined it would have been resisted by the true believers in the mantra of small government, as spelled out by one of the most successful finance secretaries, John Cowperthwaite, an idol of free-market advocates who loved the way he talked about government “positive non-interventionism”.
The stakes in housing policy today may be less stark but no one seriously doubts the current unsatisfactory state of affairs.
Stephen Vines runs companies in the food sector and moonlights as a journalist and a broadcaster